|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 19 post(s) |
Khan D'Amarr
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
0
   |
Posted - 2014.03.28 19:43:00 -
[1] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Malcanis wrote:Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Malcanis wrote:It's about what was happening after erotica1 & co already had all the mark's ISK, assets and even his API. Once they've got all his stuff, then what happened after that wasn't about being an evil character in game. It was just about being evil. Then talking to them on TS was evil? Like I said, I guess I just dont get it Then get this: once you've got all your target's money and killed all his ships, leave him alone. So Malcanis, why in your professional opinion should someone running a scam be entirely responsible for stopping? Why in all of this, while the "victim" is fully capable of ending it at any moment does absolutely no responsibility fall to him? Also; is this YOUR opinion or is this opinion shared by CCP and updated into the ToS/EULA?
Looks like they are saying that actions have consequences and if it feels like the scam feels too good then it probably is...see what I did there? |
Khan D'Amarr
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 19:46:00 -
[2] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Malcanis wrote:
"I guess you have to draw the line at the point where the victim starts to lose emotional control, and that's a different place for everyone and every situation. And there has to be a willingness to recognize that line and honor it with humane behavior. I don't get a sense from Erotica's recording that there was any intent in ever doing that. Not one bit."
So Mittani should have been banned in this environment is what youre saying. Also; any time someone ganks a miner and the miner rages, they ganker will be banned? That meets that emotional requirement that this seems to need. That will change this game HUGELY if true
He was banned in this environment. 3 months or so iirc |
Khan D'Amarr
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 19:48:00 -
[3] - Quote
Morihei Akachi wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Malcanis wrote:Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Malcanis wrote:It's about what was happening after erotica1 & co already had all the mark's ISK, assets and even his API. Once they've got all his stuff, then what happened after that wasn't about being an evil character in game. It was just about being evil. Then talking to them on TS was evil? Like I said, I guess I just dont get it Then get this: once you've got all your target's money and killed all his ships, leave him alone. So Malcanis, why in your professional opinion should someone running a scam be entirely responsible for stopping? Why in all of this, while the "victim" is fully capable of ending it at any moment does absolutely no responsibility fall to him? This used to be clearer to you, Lucas. You've changed. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3564714#post3564714
Dunked!  |
Khan D'Amarr
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 19:51:00 -
[4] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Khan D'Amarr wrote:Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Malcanis wrote:
"I guess you have to draw the line at the point where the victim starts to lose emotional control, and that's a different place for everyone and every situation. And there has to be a willingness to recognize that line and honor it with humane behavior. I don't get a sense from Erotica's recording that there was any intent in ever doing that. Not one bit."
So Mittani should have been banned in this environment is what youre saying. Also; any time someone ganks a miner and the miner rages, they ganker will be banned? That meets that emotional requirement that this seems to need. That will change this game HUGELY if true He was banned in this environment. 3 months or so iirc So Erotic is just 3 months banned, not permabanned then?
Different situation entirely so I have no idea. |
Khan D'Amarr
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 19:53:00 -
[5] - Quote
Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Asia Leigh wrote:Khan D'Amarr wrote:Antisocial Malkavian wrote:Malcanis wrote:
"I guess you have to draw the line at the point where the victim starts to lose emotional control, and that's a different place for everyone and every situation. And there has to be a willingness to recognize that line and honor it with humane behavior. I don't get a sense from Erotica's recording that there was any intent in ever doing that. Not one bit."
So Mittani should have been banned in this environment is what youre saying. Also; any time someone ganks a miner and the miner rages, they ganker will be banned? That meets that emotional requirement that this seems to need. That will change this game HUGELY if true He was banned in this environment. 3 months or so iirc So Telling someone to go off themselves is worth 3 months, While making a snide remark about someones speech impairment is worth a perma? Please tell me more about how thats even remotely fair... Kinda the point was looking at thank you
From what I understand t was ongoing. He was actually kicked form Goons for being too extreme. There are several recordings out there that have him asking people to do various things with peanut butter and/ or mayo. Read the thread. |
Khan D'Amarr
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2014.03.28 20:03:00 -
[6] - Quote
Salvos Rhoska wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:What should be a matter of serious concern to us all, is that the forums are far more entertaining than the actual game play.
Mining Veldsar just cannot compare to the forums for excitement and attempts personality ganking. Yeah, I'm fully guilty of this. Been deliberately rationing my forum time now to ensure I get some gametime in too :D
Read a lot of the thread, you were a trooper. You are the energizer bunny of the E1 scandal.
Question: poopsock it or no? |
|
|
| |
|